Detection of Systemic Sclerosis-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease by Exhaled Breath Analysis Using Electronic Nose Technology

Publication:  E.R. Marges, I.G. van der Sar, J.K. de Vries-Bouwstra, T.W.J. Huizinga, P.L.A. van Daele, M.S. Wijsenbeek, C.C. Moor, and J.J.M. Geelhoed. Detection of Systemic Sclerosis-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease by Exhaled Breath Analysis Using Electronic Nose Technology. AJRRCM. 2024 June 4, https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.202402-0272LE

Aim: To evaluate whether electronic nose (eNose) technology could accurately detect interstitial lung disease (ILD) in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) and to determine if eNose breath profiles could differentiate SSc-ILD from other types of ILD.

Take home message: ENose technology offers a promising, non-invasive method for detecting interstitial lung disease in systemic sclerosis patients, providing early diagnosis and potentially reducing the need for invasive tests like CT scans.

Introduction

This study investigates the effectiveness of electronic nose (eNose) technology in detecting interstitial lung disease (ILD) among patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc).  SSc is a rare, chronic autoimmune connective tissue disorder characterized by degenerative changes and scarring in the skin, joints, and internal organs and by blood vessel abnormalities. ILD is the leading cause of death in SSc, yet early detection remains challenging. eNose technology analyzes volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in exhaled breath, offering a potential non-invasive tool for timely diagnosis.

Methods

The multicenter, cross-sectional study included 223 patients with confirmed SSc diagnosis, of whom 110 had ILD confirmed via high-resolution CT (HRCT). Exhaled breath was collected using the SpiroNose®, and data were analyzed using partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA). The study compared breath profiles of SSc patients with and without ILD, and also differentiated SSc-ILD from other types of ILD.

 

Results

The eNose successfully distinguished SSc-ILD from SSc without ILD, achieving an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.79 in the training set and 0.84 in the test set. When comparing SSc-ILD with other forms of ILD, the AUC was 0.87 in the training set and 0.84 in the test set. The technology showed consistent accuracy across patient subgroups, including those with known risk factors for ILD (e.g., anti-Scl70 positivity and diffuse skin involvement).

 

Discussion

The findings suggest that eNose technology is a non-invasive tool for monitoring SA infection status in children with CF. The ability to detect infection clearance using VOC profiles could enhance current clinical practices, reducing the need for invasive sampling. This technology offers a quick, real-time assessment during routine clinic visits and may be beneficial for patients on CFTR modulator therapy, where sputum production is limited.